LensTip.com

Lens review

Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-300 mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR

24 February 2015
Arkadiusz Olech

6. Distortion

The chart below presents a comparison between the distortion results of the tested lens, the faster and more expensive Nikkor 18–300 mm f/3.5–5.6 and the rival Tamron16–300 mm f/3.5–6.3 Di II VC PZD MACRO. Still you must remember two things: the Tamron features a wider focal range so the distortion correction, especially at its wider end, is much more difficult in its case. On the other hand the Tamron was tested on a tad smaller sensor of the Canon 50D (1.6x) so it is very probable its results on a 1.5x sensor would be a tad worse.

16–18 mm
35 mm
50 mm
100 mm
200 mm
300 mm
Nikkor 18–300 f/3.5–6.3 VR
−4.81%
+2.24%
+2.71%
+2.10%
+1.54%
+1.46%
Nikkor 18–300 f/3.5–5.6 VR
−5.32%
+1.60%
+2.03%
+2.64%
+2.20%
+1.94%
Tamron 16–300 f/3.5–6.3 VC
−4.68%
+2.17%
+2.50%
+1.97%
+1.45%
+1.36%

It is clear that, compared to the predecessor, the constructors tried to limit the most bothersome barrel distortion, visible at 18 mm. They succeeded – its level decreased from−5.32% to −4.81%. Apart from that the results in the 100-300 mm range improved as well. Unfortunately very disturbing things can be noticed in the middle of the focal range. Already at 35 mm the pincushion distortion becomes quite intense, soaring to +2.24%, and by 50 mm it is even higher as its value reaches +2.71%. It is one of the highest pincushion distortion results we’ve ever seen in our tests.


Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

It should be clearly said that the Tamron 16-300 mm, even if more difficult to correct because of its wider range, has better results in this category than the tested Nikkor. When it comes to distortion the Nikon optics specialist didn’t exactly distinguish themselves.

Nikon D7000, 18 mm
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-300 mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR - Distortion
Nikon D7000, 35 mm
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-300 mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR - Distortion
Nikon D7000, 50 mm
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-300 mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR - Distortion
Nikon D7000, 100 mm
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-300 mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR - Distortion
Nikon D7000, 200 mm
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-300 mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR - Distortion
Nikon D7000, 300 mm
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-300 mm f/3.5-6.3G ED VR - Distortion