LensTip.com

Lens review

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO

27 July 2016
Arkadiusz Olech

8. Vignetting

Let’s check first the vignetting performance for JPEG files – the appropriate thumbnails are shown below.

E-PL1, JPEG, 40 mm, f/2.8 E-PL1, JPEG, 40 mm, f/4.0
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting
E-PL1, JPEG, 90 mm, f/2.8 E-PL1, JPEG, 90 mm, f/4.0
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting
E-PL1, JPEG, 150 mm, f/2.8 E-PL1, JPEG, 3150 mm, f/4.0
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting
E-PL1, JPEG, 210 mm (TC), f/4.0 E-PL1, JPEG, 210 mm (TC), f/5.6
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting


At shorter focal lengths the tested lens has no vignetting-related problems whatsoever. The combination of 40 mm and the f/2.8 aperture means that you lose 19% (−0.62 EV) of brightness in the frame corners; that aberration becomes completely imperceptible on stopping down the aperture to f/4.0 where the value, measured by us, amounted to just 3% (−0.08 EV).


Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

A very similar situation can be observed at 90 mm. At the maximum relative aperture you must take into account the vignetting of 17% (−0.54 EV) which decreases to just 2% (−0.07 EV) on stopping down the lens to f/4.0.

If you want to notice the vignetting you have to use the maximum focal length. In its case by f/2.8 the light fall-off in the corners amounts to 28% (−0.94 EV) and it decreases to 6% (−0.17 EV) if you employ the f/4.0 relative aperture.

After attaching the teleconverter the situation improves. At the maximum relative aperture which, in that case, amounts to f/4.0 the vignetting is just 14% (−0.44 EV) and then it decreases to a quite symbolic level of 1% (−0.02 EV) by f/5.6.

Values we got for RAW files were higher by just 1-3%; it was connected to a slight cropping of JPEG images as a way of distortion correction.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 40-150 mm f/2.8 ED PRO - Vignetting