Nikon Nikkor Z 180-600 mm f/5.6-6.3 VR
11. Summary
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Pros:
- solid, closed, and weather-sealed mechanical construction,
- very good image quality in the frame centre,
- sensible image quality on the edge of the APS-C sensor,
- negligible longitudinal chromatic aberration,
- moderate lateral chromatic aberration,
- lack of problems with spherical aberration,
- slight distortion,
- low astigmatism,
- properly corrected coma,
- low vignetting even on full frame,
- moderate focus breathing,
- nice appearance of out-of-focus areas,
- efficient image stabilization,
- good price-performance and price-parameters ratio.
Cons:
- a lot of problems with the performance against bright light,
- autofocus performance leaves a lot to be desired.
Still I cannot stop thinking that some limitations of this lens were left deliberately. On the one hand the producers wanted to present a worthy rival of the Sony FE 200-600 mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS when it comes to the price and performance, on the other hand they couldn't forget about the existence of such a model as the Nikkor Z 600 mm f/6.3 VR S. You can't make two lenses of the same producer compete against each other. That's why, in my opinion, the results of the Nikkor 180-600 mm at the maximum focal length are the weakest and the autofocus unit leaves a lot of room for improvement. If they adopted a different approach, creating a model which results improve with the increase of the focal length, it would be much harder to persuade the Z system users to buy the two times more expensive Nikkor Z 600 mm f/6.3 VR.



