Sirui Aurora 35 mm f/1.4
4. Real relative aperture
One glance at the photo below and you know that indeed the situation is not especially good here.
![]() |
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
As if it wasn't enough, the real values of the relative aperture are nowhere near the declared ones. Because of some design features, we had some troubles with measuring the maximum relative aperture, so we decided to apply a simplified approach. We assumed that the f/2.0 aperture indeed reflected the declared value and we checked how it changed with further stopping down. In a perfect case every next aperture should be by a root square of two (so 1.414) smaller than the previous one. In the case of the Sirui all other values, apart from one, amounted to less than 1.4, 1.37 on average.
To be precise, all following apertures after f/2.0 amounted to: 2.778, 3.749, 5.218, 7.536, 10.330 and 13.450. Small wonder that resolution results on more significant stopping down are overstated.




