Leica APO-Summicron-SL 75 mm f/2 ASPH.
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
| Center, f/2.0 | Corner APS-C, f/2.0 | Corner FF, f/2.0 |
|
|
|
| Center, f/2.8 | Corner APS-C, f/2.8 | Corner FF, f/2.8 |
|
|
|
In order to make the performance in this category comprehensive, we decided to present crops of photos of the sky taken from the right-hand upper corner of full frame. This time these are shots taken by f/2.0, f/2.8, and f/4.0. It is clear that even on stopping down the aperture by 2 EV coma is not corrected completely and effects of its influence remain visible in a shape of a small 'comma'.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
| Corner FF, f/2.0 | Corner FF, f/2.8 | Corner FF, f/4.0 |
|
|
|
Astigmatism, understood as an average difference between vertical and horizontal MTF50 function values, amounted to just 3.7%. It is a result we consider to be very low so the tested lens deserves to be praised.
The appearance of out-of-focus images produced by the tested Leica is untypical. I expected here perfect circles with a very even light spread, of course not excluding a delicate onion-ring bokeh effect because this construction does feature one aspherical element. There's no onion-ring bokeh but you see a bandlike structure instead, an effect I haven't seen in any telephoto lens with good aperture fastness before. As a kind of consolation you can add that the light rim is not especially accented. Mechanical vignetting gives you a lot of reasons to complain for a change. The lens is big and heavy and yet this effect remains perfectly visible and it doesn't disappear even on stopping down the aperture by 2 EV. If the lens was wider, not only long, the circles wouldn't be so truncated in frame corners.
| Center, f/2.0 | Corner APS-C, f/2.0 | Corner FF, f/2.0 |
|
|
|
| Center, f/2.8 | Corner APS-C, f/2.8 | Corner FF, f/2.8 |
|
|
|
Center, f/4.0 | Corner APS-C, f/4.0 | Corner FF, f/4.0 |
|
|
|



